Separate Share Trusts for Your Children

Posted by on Jan 25, 2011 in asset protection, estate planning, Family Law, Legal News, tax, Trusts, Wills |

It is more than likely that the reason for establishing your estate plan is to ensure that your family is financially secure after you are gone. Estate planning for families with minor children can present challenges and difficult choices to parents. The challenges originate from the minor’s legal restrictions on ownership of property and by the parent’s desire to gift assets to a minor but to defer the minor’s actual possession until the minor reaches some level of maturity or at least the age of majority. estate planning for minor childrenAdditionally, planning for minors also involves planning for the custody of the minor in the event both parents die before the minor reaches the legal age of majority. Once appointed, the guardian has a significant impact on the child’s value system, religious beliefs, education and, in general, the child’s development to adulthood.

Once a guardian is chosen, the most effective way to make sure that each of your children receives the necessary financial support to ensure that they are well taken care of is to establish your Revocable Trust and draft a provision that would create Separate Share Trusts upon your death. A “Separate Share Trust” is called that because a separate trust is created for each of your children. This can make it easier for the parents to account for the differences in the needs and propensities of each child. If one child has special medical or education needs, or if there is a wide gap in the children’s ages, parents can establish the appropriate portion of the estate, and can establish the terms of the distribution accordingly. Thus, by using Separate Share Trust, you can ensure that each child is cared for according to their specific needs.

In Separate Share Trust the parent/grantor can decide under what circumstances and at what age each child has the maturity sufficient to take possession of the assets. This will ensure that children will not recklessly waste the funds when they turn 18. However, one disadvantage to using “separate share” trusts with multiple children is the difficulty in administration. Depending on the provisions of the trust agreement, the trustee (which does not have to be the legal guardian) may have to account to each beneficiary separately and may have to maintain records of the distributable net income attributable to each beneficiary for income tax purposes.

A grantor need not have a large estate to create a trust. The assets you will leave your children can add up faster than you think. If you add the value of your home, savings and investment accounts, you may find that you are well over $75,000. In these cases a trust is usually the best solution. In addition, the trust could be funded by life insurance policies which can push the value of their estate much higher. Once established, the trust would provide for the children’s care and education and make money available to them as they reach certain ages indicative of maturity 18, 21, 25, 30, 35 or any other age you specify. You’ve worked hard to provide for your family a bright future. Plan accordingly and make sure that your work creates the best opportunities imaginable for your children.

Read More

Should I Deed My Homestead Property Into My Revocable Trust?

Posted by on Jan 12, 2011 in Legal News |

Yes! If you dont deed your home to your trust, your home will be forced into the probate process after the deaths of both you and your spouse. Real estate is one of the most difficult assets to probate, so you definitely want to assure that ALL of your real estate is owned by your trust or by your LLC. Your home should always be owned by your revocable trust.

Some of my clients are concerned that the transferring of their homestead into their revocable trust will forfeit their homestead protection. It will not affect any homestead rights you currently have. Trust ownership has always provided for the continued tax advantages and creditor protection that home owners are afforded in Florida. Florida’s Third District Court of Appeals affirmed this understanding in their Octobet 27, 2010 ruling in the case of Aronson v Aronson.

There should now be no question as to the title of your homestead. It should always be owned by your revocable trust.

Read More

Your Ex Might End Up With All of Your Assets If You Die

Posted by on Dec 30, 2010 in Legal News |

If you die without a trust in place and leave all of your assets to your minor child, that child’s surviving parent will be able to manage the entire estate on behalf of the child. If you die while happily married, there is no issue. However, if you die while divorced, your ex-spouse will end up with ALL of your assets. The only way to prevent this from occurring is to set up a Separate Share Trust for your child, to be funded by your Living Trust at the time of your death. Don’t leave everything to your ex; leave it to your child. Get a trust in place immediately.

Read More

Your Assets Are Constantly Changing … And So Is The Law

Posted by on Dec 21, 2010 in Legal News |

In addition to severely weakening the asset protection advantage of a single member LLC in Florida, the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in the Olmstead case unfortunately calls into question the effectiveness of multi-member LLCs in this state.

The Olmstead decision provides a stark reminder of two very important points:

1.Asset protection law varies significantly from state to state; and
2.Asset protection laws are constantly changing, both through statutory changes and court decisions.

Having a competent professional assist you with your asset protection planning is vitally important. It is also important to have any asset protection plan reviewed periodically because the law in this area is evolving very rapidly.

Read More

Ducking Under the Estate Tax Limbo

Posted by on Dec 17, 2010 in asset protection, estate planning, Legal News, tax, Trusts, Wills |

In a wise, but surprising turn of events, the President has agreed with the Republican Congress and adjusted the estate tax levels for 2011 and 2012. For the next two years, the estate tax will be levied on all estates over $5 million for an individual and $10 million for a married couple and at a rate of 35 percent. Historically, Republicans have often been known for their distain of excessive taxes and Democrats have been known as the party that favors big government and higher taxes. With the referendum against the Democrats in the last election and the heavy shift to a Republican House and Senate, the President had no choice but to cave to the Republican demand for a lower estate tax. If not, the amount of estate taxes paid by the families of middle-income voters would have been a hot button topic during the 2012 Presidential election, and could have been the cause of a loss of the White House.

So where does this leave us? While the estate tax is held in check for the next two years, there is no definitive answer as to where it goes after that. In 2013, we could have another year of no estate tax or we could have a 55 percent estate tax on everything over $600,000. Who knows? The only thing that we can do is hope for the best and prepare for the worst. A trust-based estate plan will ensure the most tax savings no matter what the estate tax number is in the year you die. In addition, there are more advantages to having a trust than just estate tax protection, including but not limited to probate avoidance, asset protection, and control of your assets from beyond the grave.

For more information on successful Florida estate planning and asset protection techniques, please contact the South Florida law firm of Wild Felice & Pardo, P.A. at 954-944-2855 or via email at info@wfplaw.com to schedule your free consultation. It’s a Wild world. Are you protected?

Read More

Safer .. For Now

Posted by on Dec 6, 2010 in Legal News |

Pres. Obama and the Republican Congress have agreed that the estate tax will come back in 2011, but at an exemption and rate that many Republicans have been arguing for. Under the deal, the estate tax exemption would be up to $5 million for individuals and $10 million for couples. The tax rate would be at 35%. The exemption and rate would be in effect for two years.

We know where the estate tax will be for 2011 and 2012 but there is still tremendous uncertainty for 2013 and beyond. This decision saved a lot of people from “conveniently dying” this month but has just delayed the issue of a permanent solution.

It should also be mentioned that while the estate tax receives the most publicity, probate is still the biggest threat to most families.

Read More